Huom! Kohta 11 > 2 x sama sana!!

Daniel Sturridge 1. (ei pelannut) for Liverpool yesterday but I would have still preferred to see him in Roy Hodgson’s squad, 2. (injure) or not. In fact Roy really should have put his foot down, without a shadow of a doubt.
​
3. (prepositio) competitive international games, England have 4. (oikeus ottaa) the players they want. Sturridge is a vital player for Hodgson; we are not so blessed with prolific strikers that his absence won’t 5. (feel).
​
Roy’s decision to not include him in his squad for the European Championship qualifiers against San Marino and Estonia has left an impression that he 6. (dictate) by the Liverpool manager, Brendan Rodgers. Rodgers still blames Sturridge’s current thigh injury on him 7. (over-train) by England the last time they met up. I wonder if Roy is feeling a bit guilty about it, and is now just trying to be a good chap.
​
As I was the England manager and a club manager did not want me to take a player who was 8. (saatavilla), I would say: ‘Excuse me, but you can’t dictate to me.’ Of course, I tried to have a good relationship with them, 9. (pronomini) I did. 10. was never a situation where I didn’t physically take a player I wanted to include.
​
So I certainly wouldn’t have been 11. ( ___ ) accommodating 11. (___) Roy has been. And I would have spoken directly to Sturridge in this instance and said: ‘As far as I’m concerned you’re chosen. And if you don’t come, 12. (se riippuu sinusta).
​
I remember managing Gazza and Gary Lineker at Tottenham Hotspur and I would never have dreamt of getting in the way of either of them playing for England. 13. (Ollakseni rehellinen), they always wanted to play. I would never have stood in 14. (kenenkään) way, so it surprises me that Sturridge is now in this situation.

The Independent on Sunday, 5 October 2014 (adapted)