Question 20: Compare and contrast the methods used to maintain power in two authoritarian states, each from a different region.

[Topic 10: Authoritarian states (20th century)]

The demands of the question are understood and there is an attempt to address them. The methods used by both Hitler and Mao are indicated and there is specific linkage to how these methods were meant to suppress opposition and so help the leaders maintain power. The approach is somewhat descriptive but linkage to the question is sustained and is quite effective. The structure is comparative with comparisons made of approaches to propaganda, for example, and contrasts drawn out in the specific methods used. The scope of the response is sufficient to go beyond the 7–9 markband and there is some critical analysis. However, some points do need to be more fully developed to go beyond the lower end of the 10–12 markband.

Question 24: Evaluate the impact of Cold War tensions on two countries (excluding the USSR and the US).

[Topic 12: The Cold War: Superpower tensions and rivalries (20th century)]

The demands of the question are understood and addressed with Korea and Cuba being appropriate examples of countries impacted by Cold War tensions. The Korean War is outlined but a focus is maintained on the question with specific reference to how the Cold War contributed to both the outbreak and the lengthy nature of the war. Furthermore, reference is made to how negotiations determined the continued division of the country. Similarly, the impact of Cold War tension upon Cuba is outlined with specific reference to how the Bay of Pigs consolidated communism in Cuba. The Cuban Missile Crisis is mentioned but the focus on the question is maintained. Most points are substantiated and there is some critical analysis that is mostly clear and coherent. The best fit is the lower end of the 10–12 markband.