<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://peda.net/:static/535/atom.xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>R1 Juliet  16</title>
<id>https://peda.net/id/839e1198a9d</id>
<updated>2018-08-27T12:01:45+03:00</updated>
<link href="https://peda.net/id/839e1198a9d:atom" rel="self" />
<link href="https://peda.net/jyu/okl/ainepeda/kasityo/kp/vanhat-kurssisivut/pks22/r1-juliet#top" rel="alternate" />
<logo>https://peda.net/:static/535/peda.net.logo.bg.svg</logo>
<rights type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;license&quot;&gt;Tämän sivun lisenssi &lt;a rel=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;https://peda.net/info&quot;&gt;Peda.net-yleislisenssi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#10;</rights>

<entry>
<title>RETURN FOLDERS</title>
<id>https://peda.net/id/0a4e4854c6f</id>
<updated>2018-10-03T12:38:10+03:00</updated>
<link href="https://peda.net/jyu/okl/ainepeda/kasityo/kp/vanhat-kurssisivut/pks22/r1-juliet/return-folders#top" />
<content type="html"></content>
<published>2018-10-03T12:38:10+03:00</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Evaluation Criteria - instruction sheet</title>
<id>https://peda.net/id/e4899af6c6e</id>
<updated>2018-10-03T12:37:06+03:00</updated>
<link href="https://peda.net/jyu/okl/ainepeda/kasityo/kp/vanhat-kurssisivut/pks22/r1-juliet/ecis#top" />
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evaluation CRITERIA &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;POMM1042 Craft education (2op)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Excellent 5&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The workshop is an excellent entity, and its design and implementation demonstrate mature and convincing pedagogical thinking. The workshop is interactive and all participants are taken into account individually and equitably. At the end, there are happy and satisfied participants.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;________________________________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Very good 4&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The workshop is a creditable entity, and its design and implementation show mature pedagogical thinking. The workshop works nicely and the participants are taken well into account. At the end, there are satisfied participants.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;________________________________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Good 3&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The workshop is a well-planned and well-given entity with good pedagogical thinking. The workshop runs smoothly and the actions are well I hands of the teacher group. The participants are somewhat satisfied.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;________________________________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Satisfactory 2&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The workshop is partially eligible but is struggling on. Its design and implementation shows that the teacher group is not prepared well enough. The activity is progressing, but the action is instructed randomly. The participants do not really learn something and they are not satisfied.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;________________________________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Sufficient 1&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The workshop is randomly eligible. Its design and implementation shows that preparation has not been done properly. The instructions are unfocused and tutoring is sloppy and negligent. The participants are not satisfied at all.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;________________________________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Failed 0&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The teacher is / teachers are not present.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</content>
<published>2018-10-03T12:37:06+03:00</published>
</entry>


</feed>